S386 Bill Green Card: The Ultimate Guide

The S386 Bill green card debate is one of the most important — and most frustrating — stories in US immigration history. Introduced in 2019 to eliminate the 7% per-country cap that forces skilled workers from India and China to wait over a decade for permanent residence, the bill passed both the House and the Senate, but never became law. Congress has reintroduced, renamed, and revised it across four Congresses.

As of October 2026, the country cap remains fully in effect — and although EB-2 India, the category most Indian applicants fall into, reopened with the new fiscal year, its cut-off date sits in November 2013. This guide explains what S.386 proposed, what happened to it, what followed, and what the backlog means for immigrants worldwide today.

At a Glance — S386 Bill Status
– Current status: Dead. Expired January 2021 with the 116th Congress. Never became law.
– The 7% per-country cap it targeted is still fully in force as of October 2026.
– Successor bills: EAGLE Act (2021, 2022, 2023, 2025), IVES Act (2023), Dignity Act (2025) — none have passed both chambers.
– EB-2 India Final Action Date (October 2026 Visa Bulletin): November 1, 2013 — the category reopened on 1 October after being unavailable at the end of FY2026.
The Dignity Act of 2025 proposes raising the cap from 7% to 15%, not eliminating it entirely.
S386 Bill

1.  What Was the S386 Bill?

The S386 Bill — formally the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019 — was introduced in the US Senate on February 7, 2019, by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), with Senator Kamala Harris as lead co-sponsor. A companion bill, HR.1044, was introduced the same day in the House of Representatives. The legislation had one central goal: to eliminate the 7% per-country ceiling on employment-based green cards, which had created decade-long backlogs for skilled workers from high-demand countries, primarily India and China.

The Problem It Was Trying to Solve

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, no single country can receive more than 7% of the total annual employment-based and family-sponsored preference visas — regardless of how many qualified applicants that country produces. For countries like Estonia or Iceland, this cap is never reached. For India, which generates the overwhelming majority of H-1B skilled worker visa holders, the cap creates an impossible bottleneck.

The scale of the problem is staggering: A 2020 Cato Institute analysis found that some Indian nationals in the EB-2 queue could face waits of up to 84 years under the existing rules — meaning many applicants would die before ever receiving a green card. By April 2020, USCIS data showed more than 1.2 million people stuck in the employment-based backlog, with approximately 740,000 from India alone.

By December 2025 that backlog had grown to 1,264,495 people, of whom 996,599 — roughly 79% — were Indian nationals, according to a National Foundation for American Policy analysis published in August 2026. The same analysis puts the projected wait for an Indian national joining the EB-2 queue today at 179 years, and the EB-3 wait at 38 years.

What the S386 Bill Proposed

The bill had two main provisions:

  1. Eliminate the 7% per-country cap for employment-based green cards entirely, moving to a purely first-come, first-served system regardless of country of birth.
  2. Raise the per-country cap for family-sponsored visas from 7% to 15%, giving family-based applicants from high-demand countries better odds.

Importantly, S.386 did not propose increasing the total number of green cards issued each year — the annual cap of 140,000 employment-based visas would remain unchanged. It would simply distribute those visas based on queue position rather than on country of birth.

Protections for Rest of World (ROW) Applicants
Critics worried that eliminating the country cap would allow India and China to dominate the entire EB-2 and EB-3 queues for years. S.386 included temporary set-asides to address this:
•  Year 1: 30% of EB-2 and EB-3 visas reserved for ROW applicants
•  Year 2: 25% reserved for ROW
•  Year 3: 20% reserved for ROW
•  Maximum 85% of unreserved visas could go to any single country in a given year
After the transition period, all applicants worldwide would compete on a pure first-come, first-served basis.

2.  What Happened to S.386 — The Full Timeline

The journey of S.386 through Congress was a case study in how a bill with broad bipartisan support can still fail to become law. Here is the complete timeline:

Date / PeriodWhat Happened
Feb-19S.386 introduced in US Senate by Sen. Mike Lee. HR.1044 companion bill introduced in House.
10-Jul-19HR.1044 passes the House with strong bipartisan support (365–65).
2019–2020S.386 repeatedly blocked in Senate by individual senators placing holds. Multiple amendment rounds.
2-Dec-20Senate passes amended S.386 / HR.1044 by unanimous voice vote.
21-Dec-20House and Senate cannot reconcile differing versions before Congress adjourns. Bill expires with the 116th Congress.
Jan-21Bill officially dead. Must be reintroduced from scratch in the 117th Congress.
Jun-21EAGLE Act introduced — successor bill based on the Senate-passed version of S.386.
Dec-22EAGLE Act pulled from the House floor before a vote amid bipartisan opposition. Expires with the 117th Congress.
Nov-23EAGLE Act reintroduced in 118th Congress by Sens. Cramer & Hickenlooper. Also: IVES Act introduced.
2024Neither EAGLE Act nor IVES Act advances to a Senate floor vote. Both expire with 118th Congress.
2025Dignity Act of 2025 (H.R.4393) introduced — proposes raising per-country cap from 7% to 15%, not eliminating it. EAGLE Act reintroduced in the House as H.R.3366 (May 2025).
Oct-267% per-country cap still fully in force. No reform legislation has become law. FY2027 began on 1 October: EB-2 India reopened at a November 1, 2013 Final Action Date, while EB-2 for the rest of the world retrogressed from Current to January 1, 2025.
⚠  Common Misconception: Did S386 Pass? Many websites — including older versions of immigration guides — state that “S386 passed” or “the Senate passed S386.” This is partially true but misleading. The Senate did pass its version on December 2, 2020. The House had passed its own version (HR.1044) in July 2019. However, the two versions were significantly different and required reconciliation in a conference committee before going to the President. That reconciliation never happened. Congress adjourned on January 3, 2021, and the bill expired. It never became law.

3.  Successor Bills: What Came After S.386

The failure of S.386 did not kill the underlying reform effort — it simply restarted the clock. Here is a comparison of every major bill that has followed:

BillKey Proposals
S.386 / HR.1044 (2019–2020)Eliminate 7% EB cap entirely. Raise family cap to 15%. 9-yr transition with ROW set-asides.
EAGLE Act (2021, 2022, 2023)Based on Senate S.386 version. Eliminate EB cap. 9-yr transition. ROW protections included.
IVES Act (2023)Eliminate EB cap. Raise H-1B minimum wage to $90K. Stronger American worker protections.
EAGLE Act of 2025 (H.R.3366)Same core provision as the earlier EAGLE Acts — phase out the 7% EB cap over a transition period. Introduced 13 May 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary Committee; no further action.
Dignity Act (2025)Raise EB cap 7%→15% (not eliminate). $20K premium processing for 10+ yr waiters. Exclude dependents from EB caps.

The Dignity Act of 2025 — The Latest Attempt

The most recent legislative effort is the Dignity Act of 2025, a comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform bill. Unlike S.386, which sought to eliminate the per-country cap entirely, the Dignity Act takes a more moderate approach. It proposes raising the cap from 7% to 15%, which would meaningfully reduce backlogs without the sudden disruption a full elimination would cause for applicants from smaller countries currently near the front of the queue.

Additional provisions in the Dignity Act relevant to the green card backlog include a $20,000 premium processing option for those who have waited more than 10 years, exclusion of spouses and minor children from annual numerical caps, and a pathway for Documented Dreamers — children raised in the US as dependents of H-1B workers who age out of status at 21 due to backlog delays.

As of October 2026, the Dignity Act (H.R.4393, introduced on 15 July 2025) remains in committee in the House, with no vote taken in either chamber. The EAGLE Act of 2025 (H.R.3366) has not moved beyond referral to the House Judiciary Committee.

4.  The 7% Cap Today — Current Backlog Data

While Congress has debated reform for more than seven years, the people in the queue have kept waiting. Here is where things stand in the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, the first of fiscal year 2027. These are Final Action Dates from Table A, which decide when a green card can actually be approved:

  • EB-1 India: Final Action Date February 1, 2023 → an effective wait of about three and a half years. China is at July 1, 2023. Every other country is Current.
  • EB-2 India: Final Action Date November 1, 2013 → a wait of close to 13 years. The category reopened on 1 October after being unavailable for the close of FY2026, but its cut-off now sits behind EB-3 India’s — the sharpest illustration of what the country cap does to the category most Indian H-1B professionals fall into.
  • EB-3 India: Final Action Date January 1, 2014 → also close to 13 years, unchanged from September.
  • EB-2 China: Final Action Date October 1, 2021 → approximately a 5-year wait. EB-3 China sits at January 8, 2022.
  • EB-2 & EB-3 Rest of World: EB-2 retrogressed from Current to January 1, 2025 at the start of FY2027; the State Department said the move was needed to keep issuances within quarterly and annual limits. EB-3 rest of world moved back from September 1, 2024 to May 15, 2024.
  • Dates for Filing: for October 2026, USCIS is accepting employment-based adjustment of status applications under the Dates for Filing chart — January 15, 2015 for EB-2 India and March 15, 2026 for EB-2 rest of world. Filing early does not shorten the wait for final approval.
  • EB-5 India (unreserved): reopened at a Final Action Date of December 1, 2023, after being unavailable at the close of FY2026.

Source: Visa Bulletin for October 2026

What This Means in Human Terms

An Indian software engineer who files an EB-2 green card petition today joins a queue whose front edge is still in late 2013 — only applicants with priority dates before November 1, 2013 can be approved this month. Their spouse cannot freely change jobs without risking their place in the queue. Children listed as derivatives who turn 21 before the priority date becomes current may lose their protected status entirely (the “aging out” problem). An equivalent engineer from Germany, Canada, or Brazil filing the same petition on the same day faces a cut-off of January 1, 2025 — a wait of under two years at current rates, against more than a decade for the Indian applicant.

5.  What Immigrants Can Do Now

While waiting for Congress to act, there are several legitimate strategies that can improve your position:

  • EB-1A Extraordinary Ability: No employer sponsorship, no PERM labour certification, no specific job offer required. The bar is high, but the wait is significantly shorter — India EB-1 is currently about three and a half years behind, against nearly 13 years for EB-2 India.
  • EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW): Self-petition without employer sponsorship. Requires demonstrating your work is in the US national interest. Ideal for researchers, academics, and professionals with a strong track record.
  • Cross-chargeability: If your spouse was born in a country with a shorter EB queue, both of you may be charged to your spouse’s country — even though you are the primary applicant. With EB-2 India at November 2013 and EB-2 rest of world at January 2025, this single step can move eligible couples more than a decade up the queue.
  • Monitor the Visa Bulletin monthly at travel.state.gov. Priority dates move forward and can retrogress without warning. You need to know your exact eligibility window each month.
  • Keep all documents current. Medical exams, police certificates, and passport validity all have expiry windows. An expired document can stall your case at the worst possible moment.
  • Consult a licensed immigration attorney. The rules around PERM, I-140, Adjustment of Status, and AC21 portability are complex. A single procedural error can cost years. Our stage-by-stage guide to the H-1B to green card process sets out where those errors usually happen.

Read: EB-1A vs EB-2 NIW: Which Self-Petition Route Fits?

Read: Employment Based Green Card: The Five EB Categories Explained

6.  Frequently Asked Questions

These questions cover what readers around the world are asking most about the S386 Bill and the green card country cap today.

Q: What was the S386 Bill?

The S386 Bill — formally the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019 — was a US Senate bill that aimed to eliminate the 7% per-country cap on employment-based green cards. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee in February 2019 to address decade-long backlogs faced by skilled workers from India and China.

Q: Did the S386 Bill become law?

No. Although S.386 passed the Senate unanimously in December 2020, and a companion bill (HR.1044) had already passed the House, the two versions differed and could not be reconciled before the 116th Congress ended in January 2021. The bill expired without becoming law and had to be reintroduced in subsequent Congresses.

Q: Is the 7% Green Card country cap still in effect?

Yes, fully. As of October 2026, the 7% per-country ceiling on employment-based and family-sponsored green cards remains completely intact. No legislation reforming it has passed both the House and Senate and been signed into law.

Q: What replaced the S386 Bill?

The bill has been reintroduced in different forms: the EAGLE Act (introduced in 2021, 2022 and 2023) and the IVES Act (2023), which carried closely similar provisions. Two related bills are pending in the 119th Congress: the EAGLE Act of 2025 (H.R.3366), which would again phase out the employment-based per-country cap, and the Dignity Act of 2025 (H.R.4393), which would raise the cap from 7% to 15% rather than eliminate it. Neither has reached a floor vote in either chamber.

Q: How long is the current wait for an Indian EB-2 green card?

In the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, EB-2 India has a Final Action Date of November 1, 2013 — a wait of close to 13 years — after being unavailable at the end of FY2026. EB-3 India is at January 1, 2014, also close to 13 years, and EB-1 India is at February 1, 2023, about three and a half years. A National Foundation for American Policy analysis published in August 2026 projects that an Indian national joining the EB-2 queue today would wait 179 years at current rates.

Q: Why does India face such long Green Card wait times?

India generates a disproportionately large share of employment-based green card applicants each year — primarily H-1B workers in tech and healthcare. The 7% per-country cap means India cannot receive more than 7% of all annual employment-based visas regardless of demand, creating a backlog that grows faster than it is cleared.

Q: What is the Dignity Act of 2025, and how does it differ from S386?

The Dignity Act of 2025 proposes raising the per-country cap from 7% to 15% (not eliminating it), introduces a $20,000 premium processing option for applicants who have waited 10+ years, excludes dependents from being counted against annual caps, and provides a pathway for Documented Dreamers. It is a more cautious reform than S.386 was, reflecting the political difficulty of passing more sweeping changes.

Q: What can skilled immigrants do while waiting for green card reform?

Several strategies can help: (1) EB-1A Extraordinary Ability — no employer or PERM required, faster for those who qualify; (2) EB-2 National Interest Waiver — self-petition without employer sponsorship; (3) Cross-chargeability — if your spouse was born in a country with a shorter queue, both of you may use that country; (4) Monitor the monthly Visa Bulletin at travel.state.gov; (5) Consult a licensed immigration attorney for options specific to your case.

Sources: Congress.gov (116th–119th Congress bill records) · USCIS (uscis.gov) · Visa Bulletin (October 2026) · Congressional Research Service Report R46291 · Cato Institute (Bier, 2020) · National Foundation for American Policy (August 2026) · AILA · National Immigration Forum · Wikipedia Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act.

Also Read

Scroll to Top